Skip navigation

Ivan Moravec Web Site

Ivan Moravec Plays Chopin

Album cover image

SU 3583-2

© Supraphon 2001

fascinating and deeply personal performances...supported by the sort of pianistic cunning known to very few players.

--Gramophone

Tracks

1 Ballade No. 1 in G minor, Op. 23

2 Ballade No. 2 in F major/A minor, Op. 38

3 Ballade No. 3 in A-flat, Op. 47

4 Ballade No. 4 in F minor, Op. 52

5 Mazurka in C-sharp minor, Op. 50 no. 3

6 Mazurka in C-sharp minor, Op. 63 no. 3

7 Mazurka in A minor, Op. 7 no. 2

8 Mazurka in C, Op. 24 no. 2

9 Mazurka in A minor, Op. 17 no. 4

10 Barcarolle in F-sharp, Op. 60


Production

Format: CD-DDD

Original sessions:

  • Tracks 1-9: 1965 Vienna

    The earlier VAI 1092 issue of these recordings (now out of print) gave different dates. See the link above for details.

  • Track 10: 1969 Prague


Reviews

Gramophone

These fascinating and deeply personal performances first appeared between 1966 and 1969 on America's Connoisseur label; they [were then] finely remastered by VAI, who fully capture this pianist's subtle and lucid sound-world. His imaginative freedom throughout is complemented by a scrupulous concern for the score, an enviable blend supported by the sort of pianistic cunning known to very few players. You may argue about this or that, but time and again you will find yourself returning to square one to reconsider four of Chopin's greatest masterpieces in so many different lights, from so many arresting angles. From Moravec the First Ballade's chief subject is given all the time in the world to tell its despondent tale and scarcely a bar goes by without some intriguing aside. On the other hand he locates an ideal pastoral calm for the Second Ballade's opening, quite without recourse to overblown detailing, and the ensuing storms and hell-bent coda blaze with a magnificently controlled fury. Again, in the final and glorious Fourth Ballade Moravec stretches interpretative parameters close to their limit, yet his performance is far too serious and committed to be thought capricious or attention-seeking.

Superficial is, perhaps, the last word to describe Moravec's way with the Mazurkas. Once more he is gloriously sensitive to their confessional nature, to their volatile flashes of melancholy, fitful radiance and sudden anger. In the A minor work, Op. 17 No. 4 he recreates a desolation with such skill and finesse as to suggest music which reaches its ultimate apotheosis in, say, Debussy's Des pas sur la neige. So, here are riches indeed.

--Bryce Morrison, December 1995

Fanfare Magazine

It's impossible to describe the extraordinary pianistic gifts of this artist without a string of superlatives

--Susan Kagan

Amazon.com

Ivan Moravec's Chopin is always compelling. He makes each one of the Ballades into a compelling story, reinforcing his imaginative approach to the music with superb tonal and dynamic resources. Each of the Mazurkas also becomes an individual experience, with rhythmic shadings as effective as the tonal shadings.

...his playing of the Barcarolle is one of the great Chopin performances on record, and the sound of these 1965-69 recordings remains superb.

--Leslie Gerber

Chopin painted with a delicate brush and with many hues

Where to begin with this remarkable and special recording? ...Well, for starters, no matter how many other recordings you have of these warhorses, no matter how satisfied you are with the ones you have, you need to hear this. Put this disc on, listen closely, listen again, listen again, then go back and listen to whatever your previous yardstick had been, and I doubt you'll be as satisfied. You'll be surprised how limited the palettes of so many other pianists sound.

Occasionally a disc will not be just enjoyable. It will teach me as well. This disc taught me to hear really closely, paying attention to how even repeated figurations can be oh so subtly altered from phrase to phrase. Moravec has a seemingly bottomless range of expressive resources. A lesser pianist will dip into the same "bag of techniques" when the score demands it (see my review of Zimerman in the Ballades), but someone like Moravec has a seemingly limitless supply of techniques, one for each occasion, never recycled. His imagination is just tremendous.

Just listen to the first ballade. The phrasing in the second phrase is so carefully shaded and nuanced. Not even considering any musical qualities, Moravec's sheer muscular control must be incredible. Then listen to the first two phrases of the first theme proper. Pay attention to the left hand in the bass notes - they're shaded subtly - oh so subtly - different. Again, Moravec's touch is just astonishing - extremely varied but very natural and never fussy. As the great critic Henry Fogel put it, "very subtly and sensitively colored and phrased." Yet it's never fussy self-indulgence; rather, it feels as though he's making up these works at the keyboard, and that you are hearing them for the first time.

And that sums up all these works. Moravec, one of the most underrated pianists out there today (he's still alive and performing; one of the last greats from the bygone years), is, like Horowitz, a colorist. But whereas Horowitz boldly slashes at the canvas with bold primary colors, Moravec sketches with soft pastels. In certain works, though, it's just the right approach. Just as I wouldn't want to see the Sistine Chapel in watercolor, I wouldn't want to hear Moravec do the Hammerklavier. But in the right works, his accounts can be breath-taking. Yes, sometimes I wish there was more spine in these readings. Sometimes things meander a bit, especially in Ballade No. 3, and some climaxes may not be forceful enough. No matter to me; there are plenty of other, forceful versions, but only one Moravec.

While this should not be your only set of ballades, it should be near the top of your list. In a world of piano clones, Moravec is special and unique. So is this CD. And while you're at it, check out his Chopin nocturnes, too. And his Beethoven Op. 90.

--John Grabowski

The definitive Chopin

I have had this recording for 30 years, first on vinyl and then on CD. I don't think I have another classical recording that gets as much play as this one. Simply put, I have heard no other artist who has interpreted Chopin this passionately or with this much technical skill. Even after 30 years, there are passages, particularly in Ballade No.1 (tho' also in each of the other Ballades) that bring me to tears. I find myself comparing other artists to Moravec's interpretations and, while they may have brief passages that are inspiring, ultimately they are tame, or worse, flat. For me, this is the definitive, incomparable interpretation of the Ballades and, for that matter, so are the rest of Chopin's works performed by Moravec.

--Lee Richman

Album notes

As an expatriate Polish composer (he moved to Vienna in 1830 and then to France in 1831, where he remained for the rest of his life), Frederic Chopin was always in search of a fresh vehicle for expressing his Polish roots. He had considered writing what would have been the first Polish opera, but there was a problem. Outside Poland, audiences had no sympathy for Polish literary forms, so, to the dismay of his friends, who had hoped otherwise, his venture into opera remained unfulfilled. Though Chopin did turn out a handful of songs, he focused his work on instrumental music, the bulk of it for the piano. Two traditional Polish dance forms figured largely in his early compositions, the polonaise and the mazurka - the mazurkas standing out especially as jeweled marvels of charming simplicity.

As the mid-1830s approached, Chopin developed an idea that would enable him to expand the scope of his compositional style: the instrumental ballade. As a literary form, the ballade was popular throughout Europe. Folk pieces of a heroic nature, ballades celebrated both the particular national spirit of the country of origin and the shared roots of the broader European community. In a time when vernacular culture was wedded to high nationalistic ideals, Chopin decided that the instrumental ballade not only would be equal to its literary counterpart, but would also satisfy his desire to have a dramatic means of incorporating his native sentiments in a context that would be more satisfying and challenging than the obvious folk traditions of the mazurka or the polonaise.

The ballade also provided Chopin with an exciting contrast to the sonata form, by nature more confining and “classical.” The ballade is a kind of free adaptation of sonata form. Whereas in a sonata, the development section is based on previously presented material, the ballade form gave Chopin the freedom to juxtapose unrelated themes and ideas, leaving the resolution of the subsequent tension for the very end of the piece.

Wisely, Chopin left us no instructions as to how to interpret the presumed stories behind these ballades, other than mentioning that the poet Mickiewicz influenced him a good deal. Nevertheless, many luminaries after Chopin's death were given to romantic extremes. The early twentieth-century critic and essayist James Huneker described one passage from the G minor ballade as containing a tune of “a capricious, butterfly existence,” while Anton Rubinstein saw in the F minor ballade a story of a flower resisting “the stormy struggle of the wind.” The modern listener is less inclined to seek out such specific meanings and can enjoy these works simply for the lyrical, passionate masterpieces that they are.

The Barcarolle in F-sharp is not only one of the last of Chopin’s major piano works, having been completed in 1846, but it is harmonically one of the most sophisticated, as well as being a work demanding the most subtle and tasteful pedaling. It has been spoken of as a kind of “aquatic nocturne.” Maurice Ravel is quoted by Bourniquel as describing the Barcarolle as a work of “magnificent lyricism, entirely Italian . . . one thinks of some mysterious apotheosis.” Bourniquel himself carries the analogy further in terms of the Italianate aspect of Chopin’s musical language: “For Chopin (already marked by death but having reached the peak of his skill as an alchemist in sound), Italy was no longer, as at the time of the Tarantella (1841) a brilliant pretext, but a final Invitation to Depart, a shining promise which brought with it an ever deepening peace and meditation. The fact that Nietzsche has given so much praise to this serene but disturbing quality of his cantilenas, underlined his Apollonian character. Through this underwater gate, the spirit of the exile escapes, leaving us with a single message - this sun-like rocking and this serenity.

Top

--Barry C. Lyons (liner notes to earlier releases)

Other features